Should the QA score following a visit (not full details) be made public, so that parents, schools, local authorities etc, at a glance can see to what standard/risk a scheme is providing?
Schools publish OFSTED reports, so why shouldn't we?
Welcome to the forum user6719!
This was discussed in a workshop at the conference last year; I think the concern was that until all schemes have been QA'd it would give an unfair PR advantage to a scheme with a good score compared to a scheme that had not yet been visited, even though they may be equally good.
Can anyone else recall that discussion?
Yes that was one of the reasons.
Another was that since this is a consensus based system rather than a legal framework. It's crucial that schemes interact with QA and feel that is is to their advantage and important for their development, (rather than the punitive like OFSTED). So not making the outcome public is a way to minimise potential fear of engaging.
Don't worry about formatting, just type in the text and we'll take care of making sense of it. We will auto-convert links, and if you put asterisks around words we will make them bold.
For a full reference visit the Markdown syntax.
© TABS, powered by microcosm.
Report a problem
The Association of Bikeability Schemes.